header image

An epiphany of sorts

Posted by: lubnaaa | May 29, 2008 |

This was last night.

3.05am.

I find I must write at once.

Like Jo March in her scribbling suit, like Cassandra
Mortmain atop her castle tower, I must write, brief as it is.

I’ve just finished watching Becoming Jane, after months and
months of delay. Widaad first made the recommendation, Awin seconded it sometime
afterwards, and now that I’ve finally seen it, I am left with this and only
this:

John Warren : And the famous Mrs. Radcliffe, is she as Gothic as
her novels?

Jane Austen : Not in
externals. But her internal landscape is, I
suspect, quite picturesque.

Mr. Wisley : True of us
all.

True of us all.

I won’t spoil it for you by going any further, but I dare
say these lines will ring a bell with those who’ve seen this film. To those
dear souls, you will understand when I say this:

Wisley over Lefroy, any day. His quiet countenance, his
character, his calmness, his conduct, his patient temperament, his take on
affection…there was such a sweet allure to his personality, and I saw little fault in his stiffness or his social unease, for reasons I cannot fathom.

It was then I realised that I was being completely rational. Reason alone took control and nothing else.

Oh dear God. I suspect I’m growing up.

What a blow to the wild fancies of the heart!

Pardon the seemingly pretentious language used above – rest
assured, the effects of a period film on my way of addressing things will wear
off quite quickly.

I really need to shut up now.

Enough said here.

under: Uncategorized
Tags: ,

Responses -

I swear Lubna, I just watched Becoming Jane last week too!!!

It’s not as good as BBC’s Pride and Prejudice no matter how similar the storylines may be…

WISLEY! Haha, did you notice that during the first half of the times he was on, he was so goofy and gross, but in the final scenes which he was on, he was totally like macho gila. I think he grew up, too… Or that the audience are made to finally see that he’s a good guy, too. But Lefroy’s still sexier. :P

Wisley was extremely nice, a little too much so maybe. I think Jane was looking for a little more excitement, you know what they say about good girls going for bad boys and whatnot.

Anyhoots Lefroy is as miss Aisya pointed out, so so very much more sexier than Wisley (and I am aware of sounding like a retard with the redundant use of adverbs, James McAvoy generally has that effect on me)!

Besides Jane and Lefroy shared such explosive passion, don’t you think? Their chemistry was absolutely magic onscreen.

ps: Jo March belongs with Laurie. I have never been able to understand how he wound up with Amy.
:)

Pai - you’ve had a thing for McAvoy ever since Mr Tumnus, innit? hehehe

Maddie - I thought you don’t use capital letters? ;P

To both ladies:
See? This is what I mean! Any girl who’s in her right mind would go for Lefroy! He IS sexier, and with all that bad boy vibe, plus the McAvoy factor…he’s lethal!

But there I was, sitting there, and all I could think of was how Wisley was SO much like Darcy. Quiet and more of a person than he let on. And there was this deleted scene where it showed how hard Wisley practiced to dance so that he wouldn’t step on Jane again. I warmed at that.

Lefroy reminds me of Willoughby, all playful and impish, minus the..er..seduction part. He was quite a ladies’ man, wasn’t he?

What prompted me to write was that I picked Wisley based on reason and logic. Which means - saya dah tua. I’m thinking with my head and not my heart! Wisley would be more secure, Wisley is a sensible choice, Wisley this, Wisley that. Argghh

I agree, Jane and Lefroy had a great chemistry (although Jane’s accent was quite atrocious), but if I were to make the choice for ME, I’d go with Wisley. Which can’t be good, can it? Gulp.

But I refuse to obey logic when it comes to Laurie and Amy. Yech. Alcott seeks to torment us.

Jo and Laurie, always. It’s a universal truth.
:)

Leave a response -

Your response:

Categories