header image

When these circus lights go out.

Posted by: lubnaaa | January 29, 2008 |

Currently Playing: Yann Tiersen’s violin piece - Sur Le Fil.

It’s wicked how he wields the instrument. I could just watch him play all day.

‘Sur Le Fil’
means ‘On The Wire’ in French. Tiersen’s other instruments besides the
piano, accordion and violin also include the melodica, but he uses
other brands of tools as well to capture a broader range of  music and
sound, such as a typewriter and something called the “ondes Martenot”,
French for Martenot waves, which refers to an early electronic musical
instrument invented in 1928.

What do you mean, I’m obsessed?

—————

It’s one of those heavy nonsensical entries today. I don’t expect to make sense.

I went to a friend’s room
some time back to take my books
and notes from her. I was supposed to just drop by to collect them, but
I ended
up staying until close to 4am, just talking. It’s always been the case;
the best conversations I have with people are those that go unplanned,
usually when I find it most inconvenient to have a conversation in the
first place. I love the people who can engage me without having me feel self-conscious about what I’m saying or how I
say it - it is in these honest moments I find words and thoughts
flowing out that I never realised I had in me.

One of the many topics that cropped
up that night was a question I’ve always wondered.

You know how people pride themselves on their thoughts and opinions, about what
they think, perceive, believe, or how they take a particular stand on a matter
and confidently attribute it to independent thought? We pride ourselves on
being capable of forming our own judgment, thinking that it’s solely based on
personal knowledge, experience, and to an extent, maybe our own individual
upbringing.

But how independent are our thoughts, really? How free is our thinking?
How are
we to know that what we opine isn’t just a cumulation of subtle
brainwashing from
powerful quarters who have the means of projecting their own agenda in
such an
attractive manner that we don’t see how influential they are? I mean
really, how much of our ‘independent thoughts’ really belong to us? How
do we know for sure we aren’t being controlled through systematic
indoctrination? Take a look at this, before you rule me out to paranoia.

I need to know where to draw
the line between what is authentic and what is fake, because we are
only as real as what we think, as what we perceive. Cogito ergo sum,
no? I do not want any of my thoughts to have originated from a corroded
perception of something I don’t believe in. I offered to my friend that
conspiracy theories might not be so far-fetched. I mean, if the big bad
US of A can go gallivanting about invading countries with nary a worry,
why not this? A war with no soldiers.

My friend laughed, saying I was thinking too much, but she allowed room for me
to explain why I thought so. I suppose I’ve always been one who’s uncomfortable
with taking anything at face value and leaving it at that. Maybe I’ve been
built to always reserve a small space for suspicion or skepticism…which can be
good or bad, depending on how you see it. Nothing is what it seems, or maybe I’m just overanalysing.

I enjoyed the conversation though, as ridiculously long as
it was. I have all these thoughts in my head that I keep and ponder on, but
usually refrain from letting them spill over.

It isn’t common for me to talk about these thoughts out
loud, especially to people I know. It’d usually be with strangers on chance
encounters in the street…like that middle-aged Chinese man I talked to on the
commuter the other day, whose name I didn’t catch, and whom I’ll probably never
meet again. With people around me though, I’d just feel so out-of-place because
most of them have their heads firmly on their shoulders. Everyone is just so stable; I’d be the resident
oddball.

And that’s my confession for the year 2007. Yes, 30 days too late.

I’m just less of the type to ask people “what movies do you like?”
as compared to asking “how close to reality do you find modern movies? Is it
life imitating art or the other way round?” What they answer helps me see people clearly, to see what wavelengths they travel on, and whether I’ve veered too far off from normalcy. I wish I could do that more, to just plunge into the deep end and ask people ‘hey, what’s your biggest fear?’

Is it bad that I prefer skipping trivialities but endure them anyway
because that’s the norm? Because I can’t break free, and as much as I’d love to
ask “what’s your funniest memory?” the first time I meet a person, I’d be more
likely to go with the customary “what course are you taking?” instead.

It’s just safer that way.

Enough said here.

Ps. Have you ever felt like an old soul, stuck in a 21 year old body, both naive and worldly at the same time?

Pps. Confession numero dos: I’ve developed a girly girl crush on this photo of Tom Sturridge. The photo not the boy, the photo not the boy.

Ppps. Well then, there goes this entry’s credibility.

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , ,

Responses -

My 2 cents.

On the people priding themselves bit. Gawd, I hope I’m not one of ‘em but yah, sometimes you just can’t help yourself but think you form those thoughts and ideas independently and shiz. I suppose it’s more of the fact that we can obtain information so easily these days and via various sources (mass media, slightly obscure ones, others’ opinion etc) so yknw, we take bits and pieces of all that and form our own take on whatever issue on hand. So yes, it’s not like COMPLETELY our own view but I do think the collective (the bits and pieces that we chose to believe) of it, is. If you’re still following me ; )

But of course, with more sources, comes the question of which one is reliable and which one has more credibility than the other. That’s up to the audiences to decide and I genuinely think that more and more people are getting smarter and more selective with their news. Else we wouldn’t have as much as passionate anti-Bushes than say, 10 years back = ) At least that’s what I’d like to think of the public la. Gotta give ‘em some credit sikit, yknw what I mean.

And yang, trivialities are important, to a certain extent. You might not like it but I guess it’s been established as THE social norms in time immemorial. Hey, if you can’t beat ‘em join ‘em = ) But yeah, you feisty Aikol ppl just love to go against the odds kan. Beat them first then I’ll join you later la hahaha.

And if you’re the resident oddball, what hope is there left for me? = )

P/s: I fink this entry isn’t THAT nonsensical la. It’s pretty fair to say most of us have been there. Melampau xde credibility lgsg to the point that you didn’t put your signature signature. Ke simply lupe? ; )

Wow Faz. I didn’t think anyone would get this. Not because its so alien, but I wasn’t sure I put it in an comprehensible form. The entry’s all over the place. Haha.

I appreciate your 2c!

Sometimes I worry. Well, I wonder: what if my stand all this while is based on something that I’ve been made to believe? What if what if what if…truth is SO relative sometimes.

Yes yes, I know trivialities are important. It just makes a nice change sometimes. =) I love catching people off guard. They have no template reaction, and I love the originality in that.

Faz, you are in NO WAY an oddball! And if you are, it’s not too bad a thing apa? :)
Eh I put my signature la. It’s there above all the postscripts. And I mentioned losing credibility because of the girly girl crush, which seems so misplaced in a (somewhat) serious entry such as the above. Lol.

Leave a response -

Your response:

Categories