header image

Grouses.

Posted by: lubnaaa | May 16, 2007 |

Currently Playing: Trading Yesterday - One Day.

Nothing but gripes for today.

Run along now - I have some steam to blow.

The session begins now:

#1
I’ve just about had it with bad customer service.

A smile doesn’t take much, you know? The last thing you want to see on the face of the person who’s attending to you is a long, sulky, annoyed expression. Believe me, I have met my fair share of rude waiters/waitresses. All of them are the same. They’re the ones who look like they’ve been reincarnated into the wrong life, constantly sighing and impatiently shifting their weight from one foot to the other. I marvel at their determination to keep their faces set into perpetually bored looks; it’s nothing short of admirable.

The best part of the service has got to be when they bring the food in. Not only do they clamour for your attention by slamming down the plate on your table, you will find them very thoughtful of your feelings by disappearing abruptly from the table without so much as a glance back, hence sparing you from more disgust. If you’re lucky, you might be able to see just what is it that’s got them running away so quickly. Is it the steady stream of customers that need to be served?  No, that’s not it. It’s most probably a text message that needs replying immediately, or the boyfriend who’s waiting outside on his motorcycle for his girl to finish her shift.   

I’ve always believed that whatever your line of work may be, a job is an amanah. A trust. A duty. A responsibility. No matter how low and down the rung one is on the Career Ladder, if you’ve got a job, do it right, for God’s sake. All this "life is unfair, I’m better than this" BS vibe that I get from these people I’ve encountered always makes me think twice about forking out hard-earned money to their establishment, simply because I believe that bad customer service will always mar quality food, no matter how good.

If this is the normal standard of PR today, it’s no wonder we can’t seem to compete in the bigger market.

They should have that saying by Mahatma Gandhi spattered across their walls.

A customer is doing us a favour by letting us serve him. We are not doing him any favour.

#2
A long while back, I had ranted about a certain Astro ad that I saw as sexist because it depicted only the men as true blue football fans, forgetting to include women in the process. It’s a good thing they don’t show that ad anymore.

Recently though, I caught a SenQ ad which was just pure disturbing. It features a family of 3. The ad begins with a woman at home whose wondering where her husband and son are. The two of them call to inform her that they’ll be arriving home late. Husband says he needs to work late, Son says he’s got tuition. The next scene however reveals both of them out with some friends, catching a football match on TV. The ad proceeds to show the woman at home alone, looking forlorn, before setting out to SenQ to look for a TV. She buys one, and voila! All her problems are solved in the end when both Husband and Son both are seen spending some quality time with the poor attention-deprived woman at home. In front of the TV. And so now they’re one happy family, thanks to the SenQ’s brilliance.

I can’t even tell you how utterly incredulous I was the first time I watched it. I thought that there must have been some kind of mistake. How could something so outrageous like this make the cut to be aired? By the second time though, incredulity got replaced with righteous anger.

What message exactly are we sending out to the masses by airing such a morally-wrong and ethically-twisted ad? What does it imply? That its excusable to lie to your wife/mother? That TV is the answer to family unity? That underlying problems within the family do not need to be addressed when there’s an idiot box to keep all the folks under one roof? What madness is this?!

Please, those responsible for this garbage had better get themselves educated. And quick.

# 3
**Spoiler alert for those who haven’t read Louisa M. Alcott’s Little Women series/watched the movie, and are planning to.**

Laurie  :    I have loved you since the moment I clamped eyes on you.   
                 What could be more reasonable than to marry you? 

Jo       :    We’d kill each other.

Laurie  :   Nonsense!

Jo       :    Neither of us can keep our temper-…

Laurie  :   I can, unless provoked.

Jo       :   We’re both stupidly stubborn, especially you. 
               We’d only quarrel! 

Laurie  :    I wouldn’t!

Jo       :    You can’t even propose without quarreling.

                                                          Little Women (Movie dialogue)


I don’t think I will ever get over the fact that Jo refuses Laurie. It’s preposterous! Mostly because, growing up with Jo, I’ve always related to her best out of all English period books I’ve read. Yes, even more than Lizzie Bennet of Pride and Prejudice fame. I read myself in every of Jo’s thoughts and actions, and the fact that both Jo and Laurie share the best friendship and such a good chemistry should have set the stage for a wedding in the end! I know I’ve read Little Women to the point of wearing the pages down, but I always hope for that part to end differently, no matter how illogical.

Oh Louisa, how could you?

The session ends now.

Enough said here.

under: Uncategorized

Responses -

face the statistic Lubna. If I were to estimate the percentage of women football fans…. 5 percent je kot.

and let’s face it, in most homes in Bolehland, TV IS the family make-merry tool.

I’m going to have to disagree with you on both points there.

Firstly, I’d say that’s an incorrect estimation. Just because most women aren’t very vocal about it doesn’t mean we make up a tiny portion of the football audience. Among my friends alone, I count more than 15. And as far as I know, the minority also deserve a voice.

As for the TV ad, what is reality doesn’t make it right. The more a concept is embraced as being acceptable, the more we lose our morality to fit into the norm.

You know what’s weird though? When my uncle was the CEO of NTV7, I visited a celcom football ad set at a studio and most of the creative directors are women.

Ntahla ek. My family have fun by going to beachside resorts during weekends or sometimes Branch kat memana followed by a trip to the mall or cineplex. I have to admit though, when I asked most of relatives and friends, most of them tgk tv as their family activity.

What you’re suggesting is (you have to face it) idealistic. Well in any civilization, in order to boost the civilization’s progress(revolution instead of evolution), a major breakdown is required. Contoh: Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

SO maybe, just maybe. when sumer TV meletup or TV begin to release killing radioactive wave baru families in this country will start looking for other alternatives such as going for Picnics, walk to the park, strolling, etcetra etcetra

I know what you’re getting at.

But see, what really bothers me is not how TV is projected as the “family-merry-making tool”, as you put it, but the fact that there are so many flawed conceptions within the ad itself. The lying, the desperation of the woman, TV being the key to everything.

Right there already, you have a portrayal of a woman who can’t gain the affections of her family enough to keep them at home, without having to resort to superficial means.

Nothing wrong (much) with TV being the whole family-binding thing (although you know for a fact there isn’t a lot of communication right there). It’s how TV was shown as the only saving grace for a family. That’s what’s disturbing.

That was really what I was driving at. :)

put to a corner i say ads just don’t depict what real life is or should be. they sell, we buy..or not. it’s your choice. but just to share i find that nowadays people don’t really talk. not even with their family members..and i mean like real discussions here. so i guess when the tv is on the silence won’t be too awkward with the people around you. so maybe just maybe that woman in the add didn’t know how to communicate better with her son and husband that they have to run away somewhere else to have a good time..so she bought a tv to compromise with the communication barrier. walaa!! family back by her side, smiles all over..still probably no talk..but they are there for her comfort..bottom line get a wide screen tv!

chicks dig Football!! the game! in fact i know loads who knows the game better than most guys. so yeah stop it with the gender bias already.

n lubs..the dude on american idol, blake lewis wants the movie of his life to be entitled ‘organised chaos’. lol. u shud work with him..write for the movie or sumthing. never know where u can earn the big bucks.lol.

i guess L. May just wanted her book to be real. she didn’t want to go with the brothers grimm cliched “..and they lived happily ever after”

Daad:
Yeah, I see your point but I just can’t agree that solving family barriers has to be expensive.

Blake? Oh no no…lol. I guess organised chaos is a lot more generic than I thought.

And in actual fact, Louisa hadn’t wanted Jo to marry anyone in the first place, but after receiving countless letters from her readers who said they wished Jo and Laurie would marry, she promptly sent Jo off with the good German professor Friedrich!

Now I don’t know about you, but that’s just cruel. She shouldn’t have made J&L such a perfect fit from the beginning. What’s worse is that Laurie marries Amy The Snot! Ugh. Tak puas hati.

MAJOR CORRECTION:
Jo March isn’t an English period character. I just remembered she’s American. The entire Little Women series was set in the States, circa 1800’s.

From what I understand, Jo was, for Louisa May Alcott, a strictly autobiographical character.

I remember reading somewhere that Louisa had turned down a close childhood friend, and she did end up marrying an older professor.

So. That explains a lot, doesn’t it? Although frankly speaking, if I were Amy, I would’ve rejected Laurie. He was a bit too perfect for Jo.

Hahah. I sound SooooooO superficial.

Syazwina:
You’re right. It WAS autobiographical. But you know…it wouldn’t have hurt to change that part a little. I mean, Beth DIES! That’s already enough sadness to deal with!

Superficial? Taklah! Because if I were Amy, I’d be completely insecure about marrying Laurie too. It’s only logical. ;P

I wonder what modern day tabloids would call the pair…Jaurie?

Leave a response -

Your response:

Categories